. . . cuz I know
you're all thinking it.
Sondheim is the
Shakespeare of the American Musical Theater.
(Wait for
it. Wait for it.)
Like Bill's,
Sondheim's material is so incredibly rich. It demands attention. It
needs to be studied by anyone who wants to pursue a career in the
theater. It needs to be read, listened to, and dissected so we can debate
and learn from every little detail. It's that brilliant.
(Here it comes.)
But like
Shakespeare's, it's not that exciting to watch.
Ok, ok, before you
call me a heathen, I know that most of you think the same thing, so don't even
start.
I've got the
attendance and recoupment records for all of Sondheim's prior productions to
back me up.
Brilliance doesn't
always work on Broadway.
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
2 Responses to I’m gonna say it . . .
Leave a Reply
MOST POPULAR BLOG POSTS
Email Me
Subscribe in a Reader
Ken’s Top 5 Reads
Purple Cow: Transform Your Business...
Seth Godin
buy now
The Writers Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers
Seth Godin
buy now
The Commercial Theater Institute ...
Frederic B. Vogel & Ben Hodges
buy now
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion
Robert B. Cialdini
buy now
Producing Theatre : A Business Guide
Donald C. Farber
buy now
You’re not a heathen. You’re totally right. I consider myself a huge Sondheim fan, but I have a real tough time making it through Passion.
But: is it complexity by itself that is the problem with Sondheim’s shows? Or can the lack of commercial success be blamed on wholly different things, like story, or tone? Or the fact that, musical complexity aside, Sondheim uses more modern musical structures that sound alien?
Whenever I think of this question, I think of Mozart, whose lovely tunes were very successful with the public while his development of those tunes was complex enough to be interesting to modern music theorists.
Is complexity itself the enemy? Or can we have our cake and eat it too? We want to avoid leaving the audience with nothing to care about. If the story is very slow, then a complex lyric can be alienating. But if, at a particular moment, the story is clear and compelling, will the artfulness of a lyric detract from the experience?
You’re not a heathen. You’re totally right. I consider myself a huge Sondheim fan, but I have a real tough time making it through Passion.
But: is it complexity by itself that is the problem with Sondheim’s shows? Or can the lack of commercial success be blamed on wholly different things, like story, or tone? Or the fact that, musical complexity aside, Sondheim uses more modern musical structures that sound alien?
Whenever I think of this question, I think of Mozart, whose lovely tunes were very successful with the public while his development of those tunes was complex enough to be interesting to modern music theorists.
Is complexity itself the enemy? Or can we have our cake and eat it too? We want to avoid leaving the audience with nothing to care about. If the story is very slow, then a complex lyric can be alienating. But if, at a particular moment, the story is clear and compelling, will the artfulness of a lyric detract from the experience?