Subscribe in a reader
As I listened to Barack and Hillary talk about UHC a few weeks ago, I selfishly started to wonder what universal health care would do for the Broadway and Off-Broadway industry.
One of the biggest expense issues we face on and Off-Broadway is not union mandated minimums. It's union mandated benefits.
Even after some fancy maneuvering in the last AEA negotiation, producers are still required to pay $153 per actor for the AEA Health Plan. That's $612/month or $7956/year. That kind of cash would buy a few health plans on the individual market.
Imagine 30 actors . . . that's $238,680 a year.
And that's only one union. Add stagehands, musicians, company managers, press agents, ushers, etc., etc. and you're easily up to $500,000 a year, or 5% of the capitalization of a $10 million dollar musical.
What happens to that cash if everyone is covered by some sort of UHC? Would the unions allow us to put our employees on a National Plan and save money?
From what I have read, both Barack and Hillary's plans provide everything that I have heard union reps say is necessary, including the most important element, portability (the ability to take your insurance from job to job, since the length of a run of a show is so unknown).
So will all that money go back into the shows? Or will the unions see that as a "giveback" and ask that it be paid directly to the employee or put in the pension funds? Oooooh, the drama is building already!
If a Democrat gets into the big house, and actually passes his/her plan, all hell-th care is going to break loose, and we could witness one of the most radical economic reforms in our industry to date.
